Thursday, January 24, 2013

Thinking Creatively About the Challenges of Participatory Culture


Considering the surge of youth as online media creators and sharers, Jenkins article makes it clear that educators today have a duty to teach their students in harmony with participatory culture—not at odds with it. Though the statistics can be intimidating, I felt encouraged by the ideas presented in the article about how to embrace the participatory culture of my students and use it as an asset to my teaching and our classroom environment.
The article’s definitions of participatory culture are so fresh and inspiring that I feel that they are suited to become a sort of mantra or credo to our future classrooms if we want to offer our students the best and most relevant knowledge and skills they will need in the 21st century. Take a look at this language:
  • “relatively low barriers to artistic expression and civic engagement”
  • “strong support for creating and sharing one’s creations”
  • “members believe their contributions matter”
  • “[members] feel some degree of social connection with one another”
  • “producing new creative forms”
  • “collaborative problem-solving—working together in teams”

These are the exact same attitudes and perspectives I want to promote in my future classroom! I wholeheartedly want my students to support each other’s creations and problem-solve together. I would love it if they felt connected and worked in teams for artistic endeavors. And most of all, I deeply hope my students will believe their contributions matter.
Clearly, these principles specified by the article are pertinent to our future as educators.
Nevertheless, challenges obviously arise in conjunction with the vastness and mutability of a participatory culture. One particular phrase from the article stood out to me as the ultimate challenge facing prospective teachers in this setting:
“a changed attitude toward intellectual property.”
While this is shift in outlook has positive potential, I am aware of the problems it presents. So, although I could spend the rest of my 684 allotted words describing the benefits and opportunities of participatory culture, I will instead devote the remainder of my response on the challenges raised by participatory culture and pose some possible remedies I think fit to countering these difficulties. The primary hazards I anticipate involve (1) an unequal distribution of access to technology in our various students’ residences, and (2) the transformation of plagiarism and regulations as new forms of media permeate the educational realm.
Open me in a new tab--I get bigger!
First, we will have to be mindful of the assigned work we generate for students outside of class. If nothing else, we have to beware of putting some students at a disadvantage if they don’t have the same technological opportunities at home. Instead, we can create and structure learning activities to be done in the classroom as much as possible. I can only imagine the enormous benefit to students by taking our classes to labs available in the school (computer, music, photography, etc.) and teaching them as a class how to apply the concepts of theatre or English in a technological setting.
A memorable example of this surfaced in my grammar education course last semester. We read an article about a teacher who spent a few class periods in computer classrooms with her junior high students to learn the nuts and bolts of Spellcheck. The students were familiarized with word processing and quickly became aware of the strengths and weaknesses of the program. By playing a game to try to “trick the spellchecker,” the Language Arts teacher not only reinforced grammar principles for her students, but also helped them understand that we cannot simply rely on or completely trust the accuracy of technology to do our thinking for us. (Another example of this is when ESL students might try to use Google Translate or a similar program to compose their essays for them.) By adapting some of our traditional English/theatre lessons into a non-traditional classroom setting (like a computer lab), we’re benefiting our students by helping them learn how to be responsible for the work they create.
On that note, the other potential challenge instigated by the rise of participatory culture is the spread and transmutation of plagiarism. In the past, teachers have only had to check written essays for plagiarism (for the most part). Now, in this adapting participatory culture, educators will need to be mindful of the new forms of plagiarism as it might surface in different mediums beyond the written word, such as photographs, images, blogs, videos, message boards, etc.
Honestly, the best way I believe that we can help students understand the parameters of plagiarism and how to properly credit references is to require them to use these current advances of participatory culture in our classrooms and then guide them in their efforts to appropriately cite their sources. We can do this by setting up blogs, message boards, or online communities for our students to regularly contribute to. We can ask them to find mixed media (music, photographs, art, and video) to design a creative project. If we as educators do not stay informed and active in participatory culture, then we are disabling ourselves from being able to empower, inform, and teach these principles of responsibility and creativity to our students.

1 comment:

  1. Out of all the things I read in this article, the challenges raised by participatory culture was what caught my eye. You noted the first of the three problems the article talks about—having equal access to technology. I’m torn as to how I feel about this issue. One part of me agrees with you, Alshyn—we do have to be mindful of the limited access some of our students may have at home to technology. It’s not fair when one student is able to easily go home and do an online quiz at home while another student has to go to the public library to do it. Often these different situations are the result of different incomes.

    One the other hand, however, I wonder if our hesitancy to assign online homework cripples our students. Yes—it’s not fair that one student has to go all the way to the library because he doesn’t have a computer at home, but life isn’t fair. Trying to make things fair now might just cripple them for when they graduate and life really isn’t fair. In the real world, your boss may not care whether or not you have a computer at home—he still expects you to do your company evaluations using a computer online somewhere. My question then is: is it more crippling to shelter students from the reality of living in a participatory culture world or to expect them to participate in it even when some students’ access is limited? If I had to give an answer to this question right now, I think I would say that a balance between the two is good. Don’t assign everything online, but do create situations that teach disadvantaged students how to access technology when needed.

    The suggestions you (Ashlyn) make about plagiarism I thought were good. I believe it’s worth the time to have a discussion with your classroom about plagiarism and to also take the time to show them examples of plagiarism. Most students understand that a direct cut and paste from a published document to one that has their name on it is plagiarism, but most don’t understand that it extends beyond that. Plagiarism is the taking of ideas without crediting them. I like to give students the benefit of the doubt and say that most of them don’t intend to plagiarize, but because they don’t understand all the rules, they might do it unintentionally. Especially as an English teacher, I have the responsibility to teach my students how to correctly attribute information to the source it came from.

    My last thought on the article is this: that as teachers, as the article says: “those who have the education, skills, financial resources, and time required to navigate the sea of cultural choice will gain access to new cultural opportunities”. As teachers, it is our job to equipt our students with the tools they need to be successful in today’s rapidly changing world. Rather than shunning media in the classroom, I think we need to embrace it and share excitement with our students about it. I know that for me personally, this means being more open-minded about things like video games. I hate video games and think they’re a waste of time. Instead of closing my mind off to them, though, I think I could improve my relationships with some of my students by at least trying to understand why they enjoy them. I’m somewhat old-fashioned about many things, so video games are just at the beginning of the list of problems I have with today’s media. However, I think that my students deserve for me to keep an open mind about the issues I have. One of the best things I could maybe do, even, is to discuss these problems with them in the classroom. Doing so would just help with the transparency and ethics problems mentioned in this article.

    ReplyDelete